Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!

Man Goes Deposit Box Fishing

samzenpus posted more than 4 years ago | from the I-got-a-big-one dept.

Crime 19

A South Carolina man has used his fishing powers for evil by trying to catch something from a night deposit box. Fortunately for First Citizen’s Bank, his deposit bags got away. From the article: "Employees of the First Citizen's Bank on Columbia Road told investigators that when they retrieved the night deposit bags from Thursday's drops, they discovered one bag sported a fishing hook. Some fishing line dangled from the hook. Two more hooks were found in the deposit box along with a putty-like substance that may have been used in lieu of a fishing weight, investigators say. The bank's security tape shows an individual outside the bank at about 4:29 a.m. Friday." Sounds like a job for the Master Casters.

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Wrong URL (1)

devjoe (88696) | more than 4 years ago | (#31707342)

Re:Wrong URL (1)

antdude (79039) | more than 4 years ago | (#31709314)

I had no problems with the original link.

Interesting that the Web site uses .txt file extension which is odd.

DNA test and finger print residents of city (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#31714160)

"It's under investigation," said Capt. Ed Conner of the Orangeburg Department of Public Safety. "We'll be looking at the evidence to see if we can put a face with the image on video."

Based on the image of the perpetrator [thetandd.com] shown on the Web site, I'd say the person is between about 15 to 80 years of age, is not bald, and wears clothes. I'm sure the police will DNA-test all residents of the area that match that description.

Re:DNA test and finger print residents of city (1)

tacarat (696339) | more than 4 years ago | (#31724992)

The wig was a good investment.

Re:DNA test and finger print residents of city (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#31771334)

That looks like a hat to me...I wouldn't jump to conclusions about the status of the suspect's hair.

There's nothing nerd-worthy here (1)

unixan (800014) | more than 4 years ago | (#31717486)

So, why is this article on /. ?

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (1)

CambodiaSam (1153015) | more than 4 years ago | (#31717658)

It's idle. The editors seem to think that their opinion of what is interesting will match the reader's.

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#31722400)

It's idle. The editors seem to think that their opinion of what is interesting will match the reader's.

It's obvious then that the editors do not find sex, pornography, or girls interesting.

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#31725714)

God, I'm so sick of these moronic comments. Don't like the article? Don't FUCKING read it!

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (1)

mister_playboy (1474163) | more than 4 years ago | (#31726028)

God, I'm so sick of these moronic comments. Don't like the article? Don't FUCKING read it!

How will you know if you like the article until you read it?

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (1, Funny)

tomhudson (43916) | more than 4 years ago | (#31726106)

How will you know if you like the article until you read it?

How will you know if you like gay anal sex with a donkey until you try it?

Some things, you just know ...

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (-1, Troll)

Stephen Samuel (106962) | more than 4 years ago | (#31745518)

How will you know if you like gay anal sex with a donkey until you try it?

Some things, you just know ...

Would that be you going at the donkey, or the donkey going after you?
Not that it would make a difference to my answer, but it's not clear from your question.

((For me, it's basically the difference between 'eww, ick!,' and 'Holy freaking OUCH!!'. ))

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#31758970)

How will you know if you like gay anal sex with a donkey until you try it?

Some things, you just know ...

says the transsexual with http://transboutique.com/ [transboutique.com] as his/her/it homepage.

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (1)

JWSmythe (446288) | more than 4 years ago | (#31778074)

    Now I'm curious. When you went to try it, how did you know the donkey was gay?

    No. Wait. Don't tell me. I really don't want to know the answer. Some curious questions are better left ignored.

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (1)

tomhudson (43916) | more than 4 years ago | (#31779000)

I just assumed the donkey must be gay - I heard the Pope [slushdot.com] saying he was "going to ride his ass" ...

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (1)

JWSmythe (446288) | more than 4 years ago | (#31781908)

    Reference to beastiality, homosexuality, and bashing Christianity, all in one line. I'm very proud of you. :) I can't even attempt to better that one.

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (1)

tomhudson (43916) | more than 4 years ago | (#31782116)

Unfortunately, I have to take a back seat to the Pope on the whole "destruction of Christianity" thing - he's doing such a great job at it ... must be that Nazi^WTeutonic efficiency thing he's got going. Hey, maybe we can get him to go pay a visit to North Korea, or the Taliban ... (I suspect there are many who will support such a move).

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#31824980)

I'm pretty sure that's what your mom meant when she said "Try new things, dear."

Re:There's nothing nerd-worthy here (1)

tomhudson (43916) | more than 4 years ago | (#31825102)

She meant spinach, and I refused to eat it. And it turns out I was right - spinach is very LOW in iron. It turns out that a decimal point error was propagated for decades [toolbox.com] , and that the "spinach is high in iron and good for you" speeches were wrong.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?